SAMPLE SIZE AND LINEAR RELATIONS IN TRAITS OF CUT AND GRAZING SORGHUM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18512/rbms2022v21e1279Abstract
The objectives of this work were to determine the sample size (number of plants) needed to estimate the mean of cut and grazing sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench), Nutribem cultivar, traits and investigate the linear relations among traits. At 86 days after sowing, 110 plants of sorghum were selected at random. The traits evaluated for each plant were: plant height, stem diameter, number of nodes, number of leaves, leaf fresh matter, stem fresh matter, shoot fresh matter, leaf dry matter, stem dry matter, and shoot dry matter. The sample size was determined to estimate the means of the traits, assuming estimation errors equal to 1% (higher precision), 2%, ..., and 20% (lower precision) of the mean. Scatter plots, correlation analysis, and path analysis investigated the relationship among traits. Fourteen plants were needed to estimate the means of plant height, stem diameter, number of nodes, and number of cut and grazing sorghum leaves, with a maximum error of 10% of the mean and a 95% confidence level. With the same precision, to estimate the means of leaf, stem, and shoot fresh and dry matter, 48 plants are needed. Plant height positively correlates with stem and shoots fresh and dry matter. The number of leaves has a positive linear relation with leaf fresh and dry matter.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of work and recognition of the work of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (eg, in an institutional repository or publish as a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may leadto productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work.