COMBINING ABILITY OF INBRED LINES DERIVED FROM A YELLOW DENT MAIZE SYNTHETIC CMS 61
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18512/1980-6477/rbms.v8n03p%25pKeywords:
Zea mays L., dialeloAbstract
A breeding program based on heterosis exploitation needs the knowledgment of the germplasm to produce good combinations in superior hybrids. A study was conducted to evaluate inbred lines, derived from synthetic maize CMS 61, in a diallel mating design. The identified lines could be possible nominees for superior yielding hybrids combinations with a flint heterotic group. Ten inbred were crossed to form 45 single crosses. Parental inbred and crosses together with a single cross commercial hybrid were evaluated using a 7 x 8 simple rectangular lattice design at four locations during the 2000/01 crop season. Ear yield (kg/ha) is discussed. For this analysis, the Griffing´s method 2, model 1 was employed. The combining ability analysis of variance showed highly significant (P< 0.01) effects for locations, crosses and lines, general combining ability (GCA), specific combining ability (SCA) and GCA x L. Genotype x Locations and SCA x Locations were also significant (P< 0.05). Means of the crosses over the four locations ranged from 6113kg/ha to 8924kg/ha. Results showed that the non-additive gene effects were more important than the additive. The selected lines should prove useful germplasm to a breeding program in tropic.Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of work and recognition of the work of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (eg, in an institutional repository or publish as a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may leadto productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work.