SUFFICIENT NUMBER OF REPLICATES FOR ESTIMATION OF DISSIMILARITY MEASURES AMONG MAIZE CULTIVARS
Keywords:
Zea mays L., measures of resemblance, Euclidean, Manhattan, ChebyshevAbstract
The objective of this work was to determine the sufficient number of replicates for estimation of dissimilarity measures among maize cultivars. Data of five variables were used, which were evaluated in an experiment with 15 maize cultivars, in randomized block design with nine replicates. A number of 511 data files were formed, being 9, 36, 84, 126, 126, 84, 36, 9, and 1 obtained, respectively from 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 replicates. Three dissimilarity matrices were determined between i and i’ cultivars containing, respectively, Euclidean, Manhattan, and Chebyshev distances. For each of the 105 distances between cultivars, in each dissimilarity measure, the power function was adjusted for the coefficient of variation of the (dependent variable) as a function of the number of replicates (independent variable), totaling 315 equations. For each equation, the abscissa axis value (Xs, sufficient number of replicates) was determined, corresponding to the maximum curvature point. With the increase of the number of replicates, there is an improvement in the accuracy of the estimates of dissimilarity measures among maize cultivars, however, the gains in precision decrease gradually. Six replicates are sufficient to estimate the dissimilarity measures among maize cultivars expressed by the Euclidean, Manhattan, and Chebyshev distances.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License that allows the sharing of work and recognition of the work of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the paper published in this journal (eg, in an institutional repository or publish as a book), with acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (eg, in institutional repositories or on their website) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may leadto productive exchanges, as well as increase the impact and citation of published work.